News/Not News: Difference between revisions

From esoterum.org
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
*Frederik Joelving. [http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=why-do-we-swear Why the #$%! Do We Swear? For Pain Relief]. ''New Scientist'', 19 July 2009.
*[http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20327153.300-trendy-science-findings-more-likely-to-be-wrong.html Trendy science findings more likely to be wrong]. ''New Scientist'', 01 July 2009.
*[http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20327153.300-trendy-science-findings-more-likely-to-be-wrong.html Trendy science findings more likely to be wrong]. ''New Scientist'', 01 July 2009.
:-New Scientist points to the quality of the vast majority of the science they report.
:-New Scientist points to the quality of the vast majority of the science they report.

Latest revision as of 23:10, 12 July 2009

-New Scientist points to the quality of the vast majority of the science they report.
-No awakening in Iraq?
-Al Gore and Jimmy Carter awarded the Nobel Peace Prize because the Nobel committe hates U.S. President Bush!
-"The last American to win the prize was former president Jimmy Carter in 2002, when the committee chairman Gunnar Berge called it “a kick in the leg” to Mr Bush for planning a war in Iraq."
-Holy Air Defense gun failure... (South Africa)