Difference between revisions of "Software Defined Radios"

From esoterum.org
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 38: Line 38:
 
*(3.3) [http://www.ee.ucla.edu/faculty/papers/abidi_JSSC_dec2006.pdf R. Bagheri, A. Mirzaei, S. Chehrazi, M. E. Heidari, M. Lee, M. Mikhemar, W. Tang, A. A. Abidi, ''An 800-MHz–6-GHz Software-Defined Wireless Receiver in 90-nm CMOS'', IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, VOL. 41, NO. 12, December 2006]
 
*(3.3) [http://www.ee.ucla.edu/faculty/papers/abidi_JSSC_dec2006.pdf R. Bagheri, A. Mirzaei, S. Chehrazi, M. E. Heidari, M. Lee, M. Mikhemar, W. Tang, A. A. Abidi, ''An 800-MHz–6-GHz Software-Defined Wireless Receiver in 90-nm CMOS'', IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, VOL. 41, NO. 12, December 2006]
 
*(3.4) [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/iel1/35/8941/00393001.pdf?tp=&arnumber=393001&isnumber=8941 J. Mitola, ''The Software Radio Architecture'', IEEE Communications Magazine, May 1995]
 
*(3.4) [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/iel1/35/8941/00393001.pdf?tp=&arnumber=393001&isnumber=8941 J. Mitola, ''The Software Radio Architecture'', IEEE Communications Magazine, May 1995]
 +
*[http://www.dsp-fpga.com/articles/boppana/ Deepak Boppana, ''FPGA technology fueling Software Defined Radio'', dsp-fpga.com, September 13, 2005]

Revision as of 14:28, 24 August 2007

References

Examples

-SODA SDR Architecture
-SODA Presentation

Waveforms

Joint Tactical Radio System (JTRS)

Software Defined Radio Technical Conference and Product Exposition

GNU Radio

Articles

Techno Concepts in Van Nuys, California developed a patented sigma delta architecture that can take an input form 1GHz to 6GHz and convert it directly to a digital baseband.
TechnoConcepts of Boston, reconfigurable Wi-fi
Modeling languages like the waveform description language WDL are aiming to provide an ideal high-level representation, avoiding limitations by the combination of aspects from different existing languages.
...the observed relation between signal processing code size and control code size, which is actually 2000 lines versus 8000 lines demands for a code generation solution...large parts of the code are very regular and with every change in the partitioning or scheduling, the implementation has to be changed substantially. On the other hand signal processing implementations are highly individual and can hardly be automated by some tool process.